Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[dagster-airlift] decomission section #25823

Merged

Conversation

dpeng817
Copy link
Contributor

@dpeng817 dpeng817 commented Nov 8, 2024

Summary & Motivation

Section on decomissioning the airflow dag + relevant links. very little change on this one.

)


rebuild_customer_list_schedule = rebuild_customers_list_schedule = ScheduleDefinition(
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There appears to be a duplicate variable assignment where the schedule is assigned to both rebuild_customer_list_schedule and rebuild_customers_list_schedule. Additionally, there's an inconsistency in naming - one uses "customer" (singular) while the other uses "customers" (plural). Consider standardizing on one name, perhaps rebuild_customers_list_schedule, and removing the duplicate assignment.

Spotted by Graphite Reviewer

Is this helpful? React 👍 or 👎 to let us know.

@@ -935,6 +935,10 @@
{
"title": "Part 4: Migrating assets",
"path": "/integrations/airlift/tutorial/migrate"
},
{
"title": "Part 5: Decomissioning the Airflow DAG",
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The word "Decomissioning" is misspelled. The correct spelling is "Decommissioning".

Spotted by Graphite Reviewer

Is this helpful? React 👍 or 👎 to let us know.

Base automatically changed from dpeng817/migration to dpeng817/remove_sections_in_reference November 12, 2024 18:34
@dpeng817 dpeng817 merged commit adbb351 into dpeng817/remove_sections_in_reference Nov 12, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@dpeng817 dpeng817 deleted the dpeng817/decomission branch November 12, 2024 18:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs-to-migrate Docs to migrate to new docs site
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants