Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extend variable expansion to consider variables from worker config #6047

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 6, 2024

Conversation

Martchus
Copy link
Contributor

@Martchus Martchus commented Nov 5, 2024

  • Allow substituting placeholders that refer to variables that are only
    defined in workers.ini for the particular worker slot that picked up
    the job
  • Keep placeholders of non-existing keys when doing the variable
    substitution during job creation on the web UI side (instead of removing
    them) so the worker still sees the placeholder and can do a final
    substitution (removing placeholders of non-existing keys, so the overall
    behavior does not change)
  • Do not propagate settings from the final substitution back to the web
    UI as the job might be restarted and then run on a different worker where
    settings might be different
  • Extend relevant documentation
  • See https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/169159

@foursixnine @okurz I have not implemented a default value as suggested in https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/169159 to avoid further complexity. This has already turned out to be a little bit more involved than I expected without it. However, let me know if you need it. Since we're talking about OSD here where all workers are Salt-controlled it is not a big deal to simply set the variable on all workers, though. Alternatively one could also set a default within OSADO unless this is also about ISO/HDD assets (because for those the cache service already needed to know the default).

* Allow substituting placeholders that refer to variables that are only
  defined in `workers.ini` for the particular worker slot that picked up
  the job
* Keep placeholders of non-existing keys when doing the variable
  substitution during job creation on the web UI side (instead of removing
  them) so the worker still sees the placeholder and can do a final
  substitution (removing placeholders of non-existing keys, so the overall
  behavior does not change)
* Do *not* propagate settings from the final substitution back to the web
  UI as the job might be restarted and then run on a different worker where
  settings might be different
* Extend relevant documentation
* See https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/169159
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Great PR! Please pay attention to the following items before merging:

Files matching docs/*.asciidoc:

  • Consider generating documentation locally to verify it is rendered correctly using tools/generate-docs

This is an automatically generated QA checklist based on modified files.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.98%. Comparing base (d806bde) to head (2a64912).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #6047   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.98%   98.98%           
=======================================
  Files         395      395           
  Lines       39425    39436   +11     
=======================================
+ Hits        39025    39036   +11     
  Misses        400      400           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@okurz okurz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Awesome 😎

the string will be substituted with the value of the specified variable at that time.
The variable expansion applies to job settings defined in test suites, machines,
products and job templates. It also applies to job settings specified when
creating a single set of jobs and to variables specified in the worker config.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
creating a single set of jobs and to variables specified in the worker config.
creating a single set of jobs and to variables specified in the worker config at the time of job exectution.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure if this applies, if the above is added.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wanted to keep it short. Our documentation is long enough and the addition seems redundant.

Comment on lines +196 to +198
Any job setting can refer to another variable using this syntax: `%NAME%`. When
the test job is created, the string will be substituted with the value of the
specified variable at that time.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Any job setting can refer to another variable using this syntax: `%NAME%`. When
the test job is created, the string will be substituted with the value of the
specified variable at that time.
openQA supports variable expansion, surrounding a test variable with percentage signs (`%`), e.g `%NAME%`.
Variable expansion can happen only at two stages:
1. When the job is created the string will be substituted with the value of the
specified variable at that time. This is useful to handle static information, like a directory or a repository.
1. Before the download state of the worker, making it a runtime value, that will not be shown in the openQA webUI, but is shown in the logs. i.e runtime provisioning of ephemeral values, or using different values defined at the worker level.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would go as far as to say that also protected values like SECRET or _PASSWORD would also be a great case for https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/109019 and https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/105624

but for now that's a random crazy idea

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wouldn't make this so long and avoid generic expressions like "the string". However, maybe I'll incorporate some parts of it.

lib/OpenQA/JobSettings.pm Show resolved Hide resolved
@foursixnine
Copy link
Member

@Martchus I won't block on docs, feel free to create follow ups if you see fit.

@mergify mergify bot merged commit a1c8732 into os-autoinst:master Nov 6, 2024
46 checks passed
@Martchus Martchus deleted the var-exp branch November 6, 2024 10:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants