Return key in recordings list #116
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
mguida22
approved these changes
Mar 4, 2025
bryfox
deleted the
bryan/fg-10634-add-key-to-get-recordings-response-in-python-library
branch
Merged
bryfox
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 4, 2025
Changelog: - Return key in recordings list (#116)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changelog
A recording
keyis now included in the response forget_recordings, if it was supplied by the user.Docs
None
Description
key(a user-supplied identifier) will be made a public API property of a recording in the list endpoint response.