Move dependency management and plugin management to parent pom

[siri-varma]

Description

• I think having all the versions defined in the parent pom is a good idea.
• Moved the versions for testcontainer-module and spring-boot-example to parent pom. Depending on the feedback from this PR will work on rest of the modules in later prs.

Issue reference

We strive to have all PR being opened based on an issue, where the problem or feature have been discussed prior to implementation.

Please reference the issue this PR will close: #940

Checklist

Please make sure you've completed the relevant tasks for this PR, out of the following list:

• Code compiles correctly
• Created/updated tests
• Extended the documentation

[siri-varma]

@salaboy / @cicoyle Can you please approve the builds to run ? Want to make sure all builds pass

[artur-ciocanu]

@siri-varma thank you so much for this effort. I have added a few comments. Mainly I want to ensure that if you went through the trouble of extracting some of version properties you should make sure that all dependency versions are extracted.

Also we should double check that the right scopes are used, so we don't accidentally pack dependencies that should not be deployed to Maven Central.

[siri-varma]

@cicoyle Would you be able to approve the build on this PR please ?

[artur-ciocanu]

Approving for CI

[artur-ciocanu]

@siri-varma could you please verify this failing CI runs: https://github.com/dapr/java-sdk/actions/runs/13902606663/job/38899059339?pr=1260.

It seems that there are some issue with Dapr IT tests that can be found in sdk-tests folder.

[siri-varma]

@artur-ciocanu thanks for taking the time to review. There were two sets of error

1. Due to updating spring boot from 3.2.6 to 3.4
   A) Reverted back the change to 3.2.6 because we still have to support 3.3.x versions
2. Coverage ratio for sdk-tests
   A) Fixed this one by overriding the coverage ratio for tests to be 0%

Will need the approval again for the build to run. Thank you

[artur-ciocanu]

Re-approving for CI

[artur-ciocanu]

Reapproving for CI

[siri-varma]

@artur-ciocanu Finally ! These changes are good to go. Thanks a ton for reapproving the CI build multiple times.

[artur-ciocanu]

@cicoyle could you please take a look and approve if things look good. Thank you!

[siri-varma]

/assign

[salaboy]

@siri-varma I am a bit lost.. why is this 0% ?

[siri-varma]

The JaCoCo plugin was expecting coverage for this module, but since it's a test module and code coverage typically doesn't apply to tests, I set the coverage to 0.

[cicoyle]

Can you add a comment noting this for future reference?

[siri-varma]

Added comment

[salaboy]

@siri-varma I've added a few comments.. apologies for the delay.

[siri-varma]

@siri-varma I've added a few comments.. apologies for the delay.

@salaboy addressed all the comments

[artur-ciocanu]

Approve for CI

[siri-varma]

Thank you for approving Artur. I think the build failed because of the flaky integration test

[cicoyle]

One comment if you can add a comment in code around the 0% test coverage area for future reference

[siri-varma]

One comment if you can add a comment in code around the 0% test coverage area for future reference

@cicoyle done. Added the comment

[artur-ciocanu]

@salaboy the build is 🟢 could you please take another look and see if everything looks good, so we could merge this PR.