Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: support symbolic indexing of a subset of the system #809

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 23, 2024

Conversation

AayushSabharwal
Copy link
Member

Draft while I add more tests

Checklist

  • Appropriate tests were added
  • Any code changes were done in a way that does not break public API
  • All documentation related to code changes were updated
  • The new code follows the
    contributor guidelines, in particular the SciML Style Guide and
    COLPRAC.
  • Any new documentation only uses public API

Additional context

Add any other context about the problem here.

T14,
T15,
T16} where {
T1, T2, T3, T4, T5, T6, T7, T8, T9, T10, T11, T12, T13, T14, T15, T16 <: SavedSubsystem}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this seems a bit fragile. Why not a trait function?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah I guess that is a better option

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

This should roll out to all solution types?

@AayushSabharwal
Copy link
Member Author

Yes. I'll add the rest.

@AayushSabharwal AayushSabharwal force-pushed the as/symbolic-save-idxs branch 2 times, most recently from 34f8553 to 620b0b2 Compare October 17, 2024 07:19
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit 7cb1379 into SciML:master Oct 23, 2024
31 of 51 checks passed
@AayushSabharwal AayushSabharwal deleted the as/symbolic-save-idxs branch October 23, 2024 11:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants