-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
workflows/eval: fail hard without target run #378909
workflows/eval: fail hard without target run #378909
Conversation
Without a target run, we won't get any rebuild labels, rebuild counts or maintainer pings. This might have been correct before NixOS#373935, but by now we run eval on all commits on the target branch, so we should treat it as a failure if we can't find the run.
To be in line with the terminology introduced in the README.md in the same folder.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let's have this, especially also because there's a bunch of these failures recently, which are very opaque to the PRs not getting processed due to it
Successfully created backport PR for |
They seem to indicate a problem with GHA being overloaded, imho. They roughly appeared at the same time * when we enabled running eval on all commits on master / staging. This is probably pure coincidence and not related, but I still wonder whether anyone knows more about the source of those failures and whether we can do anything about them? There were times when those happened on almost every push... * to be fair, that was also the time when GitHub Actions announced the new public beta of their arm linux runners. So maybe stuff for GHA actions changed on a bigger scale and this is entirely unrelated to us. |
Without a target run, we won't get any rebuild labels, rebuild counts or
maintainer pings. This might have been correct before #373935, but by
now we run eval on all commits on the target branch, so we should treat
it as a failure if we can't find the run.
As mentioned in #355847 (comment).
Resolves #378595
Things done
Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.