Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

super(..) -> super() #165

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

KommuSoft
Copy link

@KommuSoft KommuSoft commented Mar 29, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Streamlined internal test routines by adopting a more modern and concise approach for invoking parent methods.
  • Tests
    • Enhanced the setup and teardown processes in the test suite while preserving existing functionality.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 29, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes update explicit superclass method calls to the concise super() syntax across multiple modules. In the SleepView class, the call to the parent’s get method is now made via super(). Similarly, test case classes in test_base.py and test_middleware.py have been refactored to use super() in their setUp and tearDownClass methods. The overall control flow and functionality remain unchanged.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
session_security/.../urls.py Updated SleepView.get() to use super() instead of an explicit class name for the superclass call.
session_security/.../test_base.py, session_security/.../test_middleware.py Refactored setUp and tearDownClass calls in test classes to invoke the superclass methods using super().

Poem

I'm a hopping rabbit with a coder's delight,
Skipping old syntax in favor of what's bright.
With super() I leap over verbose old ways,
Keeping clean code vibrant all my days.
I celebrate these tweaks in joyful, bounding arrays! 🐰


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 09e986e and 1b78f62.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • session_security/tests/test_base.py (3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • session_security/tests/test_base.py

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
session_security/tests/test_base.py (1)

38-45: Inconsistent mixin setup invocation in BaseLiveServerTestCase:
While the call to super().setUp() at line 44 is updated, the explicit call SettingsMixin.setUp(self) on line 39 can be refactored for consistency. Replacing it with super().setUp() would leverage the method resolution order better and improve maintainability.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 44bc943 and 09e986e.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • session_security/tests/project/urls.py (1 hunks)
  • session_security/tests/test_base.py (3 hunks)
  • session_security/tests/test_middleware.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
session_security/tests/test_middleware.py (2)
session_security/tests/test_base.py (2)
  • setUp (24-30)
  • setUp (38-50)
session_security/tests/test_views.py (1)
  • setUp (21-22)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
session_security/tests/test_middleware.py (1)

15-17: Modernized super() usage in setUp method:
The change to using super().setUp() enhances readability and adheres to modern Python practices.

session_security/tests/project/urls.py (1)

20-23: Simplified superclass call in SleepView.get():
Replacing the explicit class reference with super().get(request, *args, **kwargs) makes the code more concise and modern without altering functionality.

session_security/tests/test_base.py (2)

23-30: Modernized super() usage in SettingsMixin.setUp():
Using super().setUp() here ensures proper chaining in multiple inheritance scenarios and aligns with current best practices.


58-59: Modernized super() usage in tearDownClass:
The updated call to super().tearDownClass() appropriately follows modern Python conventions for class method cleanup.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant