Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

fix(locksmith): Check match privy wallet token #15064

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 12, 2024
Merged

fix(locksmith): Check match privy wallet token #15064

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 12, 2024

Conversation

julien51
Copy link
Member

Description

Adding a verification that the token matches the user's wallet.

Issues

Fixes #
Refs #

Checklist:

  • 1 PR, 1 purpose: my Pull Request applies to a single purpose
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have updated the docs to reflect my changes if applicable
  • I have added tests (and stories for frontend components) that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • If my code involves visual changes, I am adding applicable screenshots to this thread

Release Note Draft Snippet

@julien51 julien51 requested a review from 0xTxbi November 12, 2024 20:56
@cla-bot cla-bot bot added the cla-signed label Nov 12, 2024
@julien51 julien51 merged commit 1b8fc83 into master Nov 12, 2024
13 checks passed
@julien51 julien51 deleted the check-match-privy-wallet-token branch November 12, 2024 21:13
julien51 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2024
@julien51
fix(locksmith): Check match privy wallet token (#15064)
55a4697 
* adding a check to make sure the wallet and the users token are matching

* fixing tests
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@0xTxbi 0xTxbi 0xTxbi approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
cla-signed
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@julien51 @0xTxbi