Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Align provider names with qBraid #216

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 12, 2025
Merged

Align provider names with qBraid #216

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 12, 2025

Conversation

cosenal
Copy link
Contributor

@cosenal cosenal commented Feb 12, 2025

Description

After qBraid-SDK release v0.9.3, we hadn't aligned the value of provider names with the keys in their entry-point.

TODO: a shared solution (see draft's PR here: qBraid/qBraid#890)

Issue ticket number and link

Fixes #215

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

Checklist:

  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules (or not applicable)

@cosenal cosenal requested a review from vprusso February 12, 2025 09:08
@cosenal cosenal merged commit de2093a into main Feb 12, 2025
2 checks passed
@cosenal cosenal deleted the provider-value-from-qbraid branch February 12, 2025 12:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Polling job for ibmq fails
2 participants