Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: correct optional type handling in
check_placeholder
#345base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
fix: correct optional type handling in
check_placeholder
#345Changes from all commits
38aaf3b
8fe81bb
7ddc5d3
0ac93b4
173c0c2
cc72587
d6040ef
16f2b79
34397a5
10e27ba
a6115df
949db22
4b957c2
587acb3
5ea1c6d
6411bca
e287209
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we can add test cases for the
default
andtrue/false
options to this file as well?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The error should be different than this as this one is because I gave you a wrong example earlier.
I would expect a runtime error that matches exactly what would happen on analysis if the code had been
{sep=',' true}
.However, there haven't been any changes to the expression evaluator in
wdl-engine
to do the type checks, which would be required to get the correct output here.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Whoops, I gave you a bad example from previous comments.
I would expect this test to look like:
With
inputs.json
containing: