feat: migrate utils/every-in-by to object/every-in-by

[Neerajpathak07]

Resolves #5490 .

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

• migrates utils/every-in-by to object/every-in-by

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

• resolves [RFC]: migrate utils/every-in-by to object/every-in-by #5490

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.

• Read, understood, and followed the contributing guidelines

---

@stdlib-js/reviewers

[stdlib-bot]

Hello! 👋

I've noticed that your commit doesn't contain the expected YAML metadata blocks. This typically happens when your development environment isn't properly set up with the stdlib git hooks.

Here's how to fix this:

1. Install project dependencies (run this command in the top-level directory of the project):

   make install

2. Initialize the development environment (this sets up the Git hooks among other things):

   make init

If you're still having issues, please check our development guide for more information.

Thank you for your contribution!

[stdlib-bot]

Coverage Report

Package	Statements	Branches	Functions	Lines
namespace/alias2pkg	$\color{green}95/95$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}7/7$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}1/1$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}95/95$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
namespace/alias2standalone	$\color{green}95/95$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}7/7$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}1/1$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}95/95$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
namespace	$\color{green}95/95$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}4/4$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}1/1$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}95/95$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
namespace/pkg2alias	$\color{green}100/100$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}10/10$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}1/1$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}100/100$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
namespace/pkg2related	$\color{green}100/100$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}10/10$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}1/1$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}100/100$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
namespace/pkg2standalone	$\color{green}95/95$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}7/7$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}1/1$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}95/95$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
namespace/standalone2pkg	$\color{green}95/95$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}7/7$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}1/1$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}95/95$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
object/every-in-by	$\color{green}121/121$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}11/11$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}1/1$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}121/121$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
utils/every-own-by	$\color{green}123/123$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}10/10$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}1/1$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}123/123$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
utils/none-in-by	$\color{green}117/117$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}10/10$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}1/1$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{green}117/117$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$
utils/some-in-by	$\color{red}132/133$ $\color{green}+99.25\%$	$\color{red}13/14$ $\color{green}+92.86\%$	$\color{green}1/1$ $\color{green}+100.00\%$	$\color{red}132/133$ $\color{green}+99.25\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

[Neerajpathak07]

@kgryte CI only fails at one README file would adding a commit to fix it be unethical??

[Neerajpathak07]

Seems like there was a lint error in the existing package.