Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bench: refactor math/base/special/cbrt* #5741

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

saurabhraghuvanshii
Copy link
Contributor

Resolves none.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • refactor random value generation math/base/special/cbrt

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

  • resolves none

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.


@stdlib-js/reviewers

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: na
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: passed
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: passed
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: passed
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added Math Issue or pull request specific to math functionality. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. labels Mar 2, 2025
@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Hello! 👋

I've noticed that your commit doesn't contain the expected YAML metadata blocks. This typically happens when your development environment isn't properly set up with the stdlib git hooks.

Here's how to fix this:

  1. Install project dependencies (run this command in the top-level directory of the project):

    make install
  2. Initialize the development environment (this sets up the Git hooks among other things):

    make init

If you're still having issues, please check our development guide for more information.

Thank you for your contribution!

@stdlib-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Coverage Report

Package Statements Branches Functions Lines
math/base/special/cbrt $\color{red}365/367$
$\color{green}+99.45\%$
$\color{red}17/18$
$\color{green}+94.44\%$
$\color{green}3/3$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{red}365/367$
$\color{green}+99.45\%$
math/base/special/cbrtf $\color{green}180/180$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}5/5$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}2/2$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}180/180$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
math/base/special/cceilf $\color{green}107/107$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}3/3$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}1/1$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}107/107$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
math/base/special/cceiln $\color{green}266/266$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}5/5$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}2/2$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$
$\color{green}266/266$
$\color{green}+100.00\%$

The above coverage report was generated for the changes in this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Math Issue or pull request specific to math functionality. Needs Review A pull request which needs code review.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants