Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improved wording in asset checkout emails #16446

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

marcusmoore
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR improves the wording of the subject line and introduction text for asset checkout emails and reminders to improve clarity around the user needing potentially needing to take an action (accepting the asset).

Scenario Before After Comment
Asset not requiring acceptance checked out image image No change
First email for asset requiring acceptance image image Text added telling the user they need to accept the asset
Reminder sent for asset requiring acceptance image image "Reminder" added to subject line.

Text changed to signify an asset was "recently" checked out to them

@marcusmoore
Copy link
Collaborator Author

That table renders horribly but should get the point across...

@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ public function content(): Content
{
$this->item->load('assetstatus');
$eula = method_exists($this->item, 'getEula') ? $this->item->getEula() : '';
$req_accept = method_exists($this->item, 'requireAcceptance') ? $this->item->requireAcceptance() : 0;
$req_accept = $this->requiresAcceptance();
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are we sure we want to change this? I think this was there for checkout to location, other assets, etc.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@snipe Double-check me but the old line is pulled as is into the private method so I can call it repeatedly in the introductionLine() method.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants