fix: missing rewardId

[0xApotheosis]

Description

Adds typing to the query params of the routes in position details, which exposes the actual issue: rewardAddress (and contractAddress) is not guaranteed to be defined.

Guard against that so we don't crash:

Side note, we should be typing all of these stringified query params, but the DeFi section is already a mess of duplicate spaghetti and it's probably best to just burn it all.

Issue (if applicable)

Closes #8910

Risk

Low

What protocols, transaction types, wallets or contract interactions might be affected by this PR?

Interaction with "Each" positions.

Testing

Engineering

Operations

• 🏁 My feature is behind a flag and doesn't require operations testing (yet)

Screenshots (if applicable)

This branch, no "Manage" button:

Production, manage button of death:

[gomesalexandre]

Tested against develop (left), while I'm all for type safety, I don't think this guy is what we want at runtime, IIRC rewardId is actually expected to be optional (i.e all opportunities may not yield rewards), though as you've mentioned in the PR body, hard to confirm without proper types!

• ATOM manage is now hasta la vista 🚫

• I don't think removing "Manage" for RFOX altogether is what we want. The whole reason RFOX it's not working with "By Asset" is probably the same as other things that were/are broken there: we never gave it love until it became the main and only view in feat: the big short #8876. With that being said, "Manage" should work the same way it did in "By Provider" i.e linking to RFOX, see below:

https://github.com/shapeshift/web/pull/7373/files#diff-a64829c641769089ca72cc06804147035ee12f34d7544ed437fe5b4b6e387248R86-R89

[gomesalexandre]

Relevant comment: #8917 (comment)