refactor: drop the "syntactic sugar" field, no one uses it #209
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It looks like this field isn't being used anymore. Removing it doesn't fail the tests, and the code only seems to ignored it.
ctron
force-pushed
the
feature/refactor_3
branch
from
fad1dd7 to
cd9aceb
Compare
|
I think that field is/was used by the human UI? So that we can display the definition as typed? Since |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It looks like this field isn't being used anymore. Removing it doesn't fail the tests, and the code only seems to ignored it.