Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Configure sitemap and robots.txt files #35

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 15, 2025
Merged

Configure sitemap and robots.txt files #35

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 15, 2025

Conversation

rob93c
Copy link
Owner

@rob93c rob93c commented Mar 15, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced website discoverability by implementing updated search engine configurations.
    • Improved content indexing through refined directives that guide efficient crawling and accurate mapping of site structure.

@rob93c rob93c added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 15, 2025
@rob93c rob93c requested a review from MartelliEnrico March 15, 2025 10:24
@rob93c rob93c self-assigned this Mar 15, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 15, 2025

Walkthrough

Two new public files have been added. The robots.txt file instructs web crawlers by allowing all user agents access and specifying the location of the sitemap. The sitemap.xml file conforms to the sitemap protocol by including the website URL, a last modification date (2025-03-15), a daily change frequency, and a priority value of 1.0.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
public/robots.txt, public/sitemap.xml New public files added. The robots.txt file allows all user agents and points to the sitemap, while the sitemap.xml file provides structured site data (URL, last modification date, change frequency, and priority) for search engines.

Poem

(_/)
Hoppity hop—I’m thrilled to spy,
New files guiding web bots by.
Robots and sitemap in clear view,
A digital garden, fresh as dew!

Tip

⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments. This experimental feature enhances review discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments.
    - To enable this feature, set early_access to true under in the settings.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
public/robots.txt (1)

5-5: Check trailing blank line.
There appears to be an extra blank (or extraneous) line at the end. Please verify if this is intended or if it should be trimmed to maintain file cleanliness.

public/sitemap.xml (1)

10-10: Formatting: Trailing newline.
Ensure that the file has an appropriate trailing newline for consistency with other XML files in the repository.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9535a5b and 0e28c3f.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • public/robots.txt (1 hunks)
  • public/sitemap.xml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
public/robots.txt (1)

1-4: Valid robots.txt configuration.
The file correctly allows all user agents, permits access to the entire site via Allow: /, and references the sitemap with the proper URL.

public/sitemap.xml (1)

1-9: Sitemap XML structure review.
The XML file conforms to the sitemap protocol with a valid XML declaration and a <urlset> containing all required <url> elements such as <loc>, <lastmod>, <changefreq>, and <priority>. Note that the file starts with a potential Byte Order Mark (BOM) ( before <?xml ...), which most parsers handle correctly but should be verified if it’s causing any issues in your processing pipeline.

@rob93c rob93c merged commit 4c255ee into main Mar 15, 2025
1 check passed
@rob93c rob93c deleted the add-sitemap branch March 15, 2025 10:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant