feat: give CI workloads their own namespace #459
Conversation
|
/retest |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: lcarva, lingyzhuang, otaviof, Roming22 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
There is no reason for the development application to run in a namespace with the extra secrets needed by the ci. This split provides better segregation of information and makes the development namespace identical to the other deployment namespaces in term of configuration. rh-pre-commit.version: 2.3.2 rh-pre-commit.check-secrets: ENABLED
Roming22
force-pushed
the
feat/app-ci-ns
branch
from
015082f to
8a622bf
Compare
|
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
|
|
CI is not going to pass because of the dependency on redhat-appstudio/rhtap-e2e#227. |
|
/retest |
|
@Roming22: The following test has Failed, say /retest to rerun failed tests.
Inspecting Test ArtifactsTo inspect your test artifacts, follow these steps:
mkdir -p oras-artifacts
cd oras-artifacts
oras pull quay.io/konflux-test-storage/rhtap-team/rhtap-cli:e2e-4.16-h7gxlTest results analysis<not enabled> |
There is no reason for the development application to run in a namespace with the extra secrets needed by the ci.
This split provides better segregation of information and makes the development namespace identical to the other deployment namespaces in term of configuration.
rh-pre-commit.version: 2.3.2
rh-pre-commit.check-secrets: ENABLED