Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-4.15-compatibility] Bug 2259961: Adds fallback layer for multi cluster code in External mode #1216

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #1212

/assign SanjalKatiyar

@bipuladh
Copy link
Contributor

bipuladh commented Feb 7, 2024

/approve
/lgtm

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 7, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bipuladh, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved label Feb 7, 2024
@bipuladh bipuladh changed the title [release-4.15-compatibility] Adds fallback layer for multi cluster code in External mode [release-4.15-compatibility] Bug 2259961: Adds fallback layer for multi cluster code in External mode Feb 7, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 7, 2024

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2259961, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

2 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @nehaberry

In response to this:

[release-4.15-compatibility] Bug 2259961: Adds fallback layer for multi cluster code in External mode

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@bipuladh
Copy link
Contributor

bipuladh commented Feb 7, 2024

/bugzilla refresh

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 7, 2024

@openshift-ci[bot]: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: nehaberry.

Note that only red-hat-storage members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2259961, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

2 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @nehaberry

In response to this:

[release-4.15-compatibility] Bug 2259961: Adds fallback layer for multi cluster code in External mode

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 7, 2024

@bipuladh: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2259961, which is valid.

2 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @nehaberry

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 7, 2024

@openshift-ci[bot]: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: nehaberry.

Note that only red-hat-storage members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

@bipuladh: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2259961, which is valid.

2 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @nehaberry

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit f1b3f95 into red-hat-storage:release-4.15-compatibility Feb 7, 2024
1 check passed
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 7, 2024

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2259961 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

[release-4.15-compatibility] Bug 2259961: Adds fallback layer for multi cluster code in External mode

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants