Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP refactor #1

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Apr 22, 2023
Merged

WIP refactor #1

merged 4 commits into from
Apr 22, 2023

Conversation

ravilushqa
Copy link
Owner

@ravilushqa ravilushqa commented Apr 20, 2023

Description

This WIP pull request includes several changes to improve the functionality, security, and performance of the application. It includes a new GitHub Workflow using ChatGPT for automated code reviews, a new GithubClient struct with methods to interact with GitHub Pull Requests, updated dependencies for improved security and stability, and a refactored codebase with updates to the GitHub Go SDK version.

Changes

  • Added a GitHub Workflow for automated code reviews using ChatGPT in .github/workflows/cr.yml.
  • Added a new GithubClient struct with methods to interact with Github Pull Requests in github.go.
  • Added several new dependencies to the 'require' block in go.mod.
  • Updated dependencies to latest versions for improved security and stability in go.sum.
  • Refactored code and updated GitHub Go SDK version in main.go.
  • Added a new function to the OpenAIClient struct to enable chat completion using GPT 3.5 Turbo model in openai.go.

@ravilushqa ravilushqa self-assigned this Apr 20, 2023
@cr-gpt
Copy link

cr-gpt bot commented Apr 20, 2023

Seems you are using me but didn't get OPENAI_API_KEY seted in Variables for this repo. you could follow readme for more information

- uses: anc95/ChatGPT-CodeReview@main
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
OPENAI_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.OPENAI_API_KEY }} No newline at end of file
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This code patch is for a GitHub Action that runs a code review using OpenAI's GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) model. The permissions are set to allow reading contents and writing pull requests. The action is triggered for pull request events when they are opened, reopened, or synchronized.

The "test" job is specified to run on a Ubuntu Latest environment. The steps in the job involve using the "anc95/ChatGPT-CodeReview@main" action and setting environment variables for the GitHub token and OpenAI API key.

One possible improvement suggestion could be to add more specific conditions for triggering the code review, such as only triggering it when certain criteria are met, e.g., specific file changes or changes in certain lines of code.

It is hard to assess bug risks without looking at the implementation of the ChatGPT-CodeReview action, but it would be important to thoroughly test the functionality and ensure that it is secure before using it in a production environment.

github.go Outdated
func (g *GithubClient) UpdatePullRequest(ctx context.Context, owner, repo string, number int, pr *github.PullRequest) (*github.PullRequest, error) {
updatedPR, _, err := g.client.PullRequests.Edit(ctx, owner, repo, number, pr)
return updatedPR, err
}
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a code patch for a Github API client implemented in Go.
The client provides basic functionality for interacting with Github's Pull Requests API. The code is mostly correct and follows best practices for writing idiomatic Go code.

However, there are a few areas for potential improvement.

  1. The constant baseGithubURL is defined but never used. It should be removed from the code.

  2. The method GetPullRequestDiff returns a string, which makes it harder to work with. It would be better to return a slice of strings, where each string is a single line of the diff. This would make it easier to parse and manipulate the diff.

  3. The method UpdatePullRequest takes a pointer to a github.PullRequest object, but it's not clear what fields of the object it updates. It would be better to add a comment explaining what fields are expected to be modified by the caller.

Overall, the code looks good and should work correctly for the intended use case.

golang.org/x/sys v0.6.0 // indirect
google.golang.org/appengine v1.6.7 // indirect
google.golang.org/protobuf v1.28.0 // indirect
)
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This code patch adds new dependencies to the module and updates existing dependencies to their latest versions. The added dependencies are indirect and seem to be needed by the existing dependencies. All the dependencies have specific versions mentioned in the code, which will ensure that the code works consistently across different environments. It is a good practice to pin specific versions of dependencies to avoid unexpected behavior caused by changes in dependent packages. Overall, this seems like a safe and necessary update to the code.

google.golang.org/protobuf v1.26.0-rc.1/go.mod h1:jlhhOSvTdKEhbULTjvd4ARK9grFBp09yW+WbY/TyQbw=
google.golang.org/protobuf v1.26.0/go.mod h1:9q0QmTI4eRPtz6boOQmLYwt+qCgq0jsYwAQnmE0givc=
google.golang.org/protobuf v1.28.0 h1:w43yiav+6bVFTBQFZX0r7ipe9JQ1QsbMgHwbBziscLw=
google.golang.org/protobuf v1.28.0/go.mod h1:HV8QOd/L58Z+nl8r43ehVNZIU/HEI6OcFqwMG9pJV4I=
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code patch includes updates to various Go packages, adding new versions and updating existing ones. There are no clear bug risks or improvement suggestions that can be identified without further context as to how these packages are being used in the codebase. However, it is always a good practice to thoroughly test updated packages before deploying them to production.

}

return nil
}
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall, the code looks good, but there are a few suggestions for improvement:

  1. Use github.com/google/go-github library instead of sending HTTP requests manually. The library handles the API requests and responses, making the code more concise and easier to read.

  2. In the parseGitDiffAndSplitPerFile function, it would be useful to have error handling for when no files are found in the diff.

  3. Instead of using split to skip certain files, consider using a regular expression to match the file names.

  4. The generateJiraLinkByTitle function could be improved by using regular expressions to extract the JIRA ticket number from the title instead of hardcoded substrings.

  5. In the updatePullRequestDescription function, it would be useful to check that the update was successful by checking the response status code, instead of assuming success.

openai.go Outdated
}

return resp.Choices[0].Message.Content, nil
}
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This code patch is adding a new struct and method for interacting with the OpenAI API to generate a GitHub pull request description.

The OpenAIClient struct has a single field, client, which is an instance of the OpenAI client used to make API requests. The NewOpenAIClient function creates a new instance of OpenAIClient with the given API token.

The ChatCompletion method on OpenAIClient takes a context, a slice of openai.ChatCompletionMessage structs, and returns a string and an error. It uses the OpenAI client to make a chat completion request with the given messages, and returns the generated text in the first choice of the response. If there is an error, it prints an error message and returns the error.

There are no major bug risks in this code patch, but it would be helpful to have error handling throughout the code to handle any potential errors that may occur. Additionally, it would be good to have more comments to make the code more readable and understandable.

func (c *Client) CompareCommits(ctx context.Context, owner, repo, base, head string) (*github.CommitsComparison, error) {
comp, _, err := c.client.Repositories.CompareCommits(ctx, owner, repo, base, head, nil)
return comp, err
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code patch seems to provide a wrapper around the GitHub API client library to perform actions related to Pull Requests. Here are some observations:

  • The code seems well-structured and easy to read.
  • The functions seem to be correctly named and provide helpful functionality required for interacting with pull requests on GitHub's REST APIs.
  • The NewClient function appears to construct a new instance of the Client struct, which is used to work with the underlying GitHub API client.
  • The HTTP requests performed by the functions - Get, Update, CompareCommits, etc. - can return errors that are not propagated up. It's advisable to check for such errors and handle them appropriately (e.g., logging or returning them).
  • The return signature of some functions like GetPullRequestFiles, GetPullRequestDiff, and CompareCommits seem to conform to the expected response types of the underlying GitHub API calls, but it may help to add more documentation as to what they represent.
  • It might also be useful to add a Close method to the Client struct to allow for manual closure of the underlying HTTP connection when needed.

Overall, the code seems fine, but it would benefit from adding error handling and some more explanatory comments.

Repository owner deleted a comment from cr-gpt bot Apr 22, 2023
@ravilushqa ravilushqa merged commit 399a81f into main Apr 22, 2023
@ravilushqa ravilushqa deleted the improvements branch April 22, 2023 08:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant