feat: Update constructor judgments of LLRT

[nabetti1720]

In LLRT, this corresponds to the following message that occurs in the execution of the constructor of an object that requires one or more arguments.

See also. unjs/runtime-compat#126

      {
        "name": "api.Request.Request",
        "info": {
          "code": "bcd.testConstructor('Request')",
          "exposure": "Window"
        },
        "result": null,
        "message": "threw TypeError: Error calling function with 0 argument(s) while 1 where expected"
      },

Execution results in LLRT (cli mode):

% ./llrt -v                              
LLRT (darwin arm64) 0.1.14-beta

% ./llrt -e "const req = new Request();"                     
TypeError: Error calling function with 0 argument(s) while 1 where expected
    at <eval> (eval_script:1:13)

[queengooborg]

Hi there, thanks for your PR! It looks like your commits are not signed, which is a requirement for this repository. If you're unable to set up signing locally, you can also make this change directly from the GitHub web interface and it will be signed automatically!

[nabetti1720]

Hi there, thanks for your PR! It looks like your commits are not signed, which is a requirement for this repository. If you're unable to set up signing locally, you can also make this change directly from the GitHub web interface and it will be signed automatically!

Thank you for telling us why it is not merged.
And I apologize for not understanding the requirements of this repository.

Due to the fact that I don't know how to put an author's name on the current commit, and fortunately it is a small correction, I am going to withdraw it for now.
Once again, we are pleased to promote this project with a prominent commitment.