-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add check that vnic with same name doesn't has the same network #109
Changes from 6 commits
d1442f1
8f13077
9f00269
0fbd0c1
8d94d81
75a3fdd
40ad8ec
7633789
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -21,8 +21,8 @@ func (m *mockClient) CreateNIC( | |
return nil, newError(ENotFound, "VM with ID %s not found for NIC creation", vmid) | ||
} | ||
for _, n := range m.nics { | ||
if n.name == name { | ||
return nil, newError(ENotFound, "NIC with name %s is already in use", name) | ||
if n.name == name && m.vnicProfiles[n.vnicProfileID].networkID == m.vnicProfiles[vnicProfileID].networkID { | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I checked in my local setup, if I remove this change the test still passes. That means that there is no test that catches this bug. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. @mgold1234 this is still not resolved. If I remove this change and run the test suite the test passes. There needs to be a test that fails if this change is not added. |
||
return nil, newError(ENotFound, "NIC with same name %s is already in use", name) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This name change is misleading. The error message below should also be changed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
WDYT about -("create 2 NICs with same name %s (%v)", name, err)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@janosdebugs , we have some functions for create nic:
and more...
regarding 2 and 3 what do you suggest? if I change 2 as it was assertCannotCreateNIC, what is the differerent from 3?
maybe change it to 'assertCannotCreateNICWithName'?
and 3 will be assertCannotCreateNICWithVNICProfile?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would personally prefer having two functions:
assertCanCreateNICWithVNICProfile
andassertCannotCreateNICWithVNICProfile
. This should cover everything we need, right?