[WIP] Aggregation debugging #191

cygnusv · 2024-07-24T17:44:49Z

Type of PR:

Required reviews:

How many reviews does the PR author need?

1
2
3

What this does:

High-level idea of the changes introduced in this PR.
List relevant API changes (if any), as well as related PRs and issues.

Issues fixed/closed:

Fixes #...

Why it's needed:

Explain how this PR fits in the greater context of the NuCypher Network.
E.g., if this PR address a nucypher/productdev issue, let reviewers know!

Notes for reviewers:

What should reviewers focus on?
Is there a particular commit/function/section of your PR that requires more attention from reviewers?

Note that this makes the test to trivially pass, but we're interested in the console output. Run with `cargo test --no-default-features parse_file -- --nocapture`

piotr-roslaniec and others added 5 commits July 24, 2024 18:02

setup debugging

884a78b

use ferveo data structures

da3af4f

Optimistic verification passes but verifying aggregation fails

6dc3355

Clarify comment during aggregation verification

28fd1d6

Just for investigation purposes: check what transcripts are correct

59bf3d0

Note that this makes the test to trivially pass, but we're interested in the console output. Run with `cargo test --no-default-features parse_file -- --nocapture`

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

[WIP] Aggregation debugging #191

[WIP] Aggregation debugging #191

cygnusv commented Jul 24, 2024

[WIP] Aggregation debugging #191

Are you sure you want to change the base?

[WIP] Aggregation debugging #191

Conversation

cygnusv commented Jul 24, 2024