User/austinl/ps get process exit status #191
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Austin-Lamb
requested review from
Alan-Jowett,
mtfriesen and
nibanks
as code owners
Alan-Jowett
approved these changes
May 1, 2024
nibanks
approved these changes
May 1, 2024
|
Thanks for the contribution! |
This was referenced May 1, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds support for the
PsGetProcessExitStatusAPI, to be used downstream. This allows test code to install a callback and simulate any process exit code it wants, so we can test success and failure cases without needing to actually launch processes.While doing this I noticed that the
Ps*tests were missing from thevcxprojso I added them so they run when runningusersim_tests.exe -d yesas recommended in the repo readme. The new test and the existing one both pass locally.