Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove Static JAAS Configuration Setting in KerbAuthentication #2590

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

muskan124947
Copy link
Contributor

@muskan124947 muskan124947 commented Jan 23, 2025

Github Issue: #2586 -> Driver should not override default JAAS configuration

Action: Remover call javax.security.auth.login.Configuration.setConfiguration from static block in class com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.KerbAuthentication

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 23, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 51.34%. Comparing base (03cfcfd) to head (5b37c66).

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #2590      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     51.22%   51.34%   +0.11%     
- Complexity     3956     3977      +21     
============================================
  Files           147      147              
  Lines         33657    33655       -2     
  Branches       5624     5624              
============================================
+ Hits          17241    17280      +39     
+ Misses        14002    13980      -22     
+ Partials       2414     2395      -19     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@muskan124947 muskan124947 marked this pull request as draft January 23, 2025 06:36
@muskan124947 muskan124947 changed the title Testing login module changes Remove Static JAAS Configuration Setting in KerbAuthentication Jan 29, 2025
@muskan124947 muskan124947 self-assigned this Jan 29, 2025
@muskan124947 muskan124947 marked this pull request as ready for review January 29, 2025 08:43
@David-Engel
Copy link
Collaborator

@muskan124947 Please include a detailed description of the change (what, why, behavior implications, etc.) and link to the source issue (if applicable) so that we can have context for the PR.

@muskan124947
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: In progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants