Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Patch expat for CVE-2024-8176 [HIGH] #13062

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: fasttrack/3.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kgodara912
Copy link
Contributor

@kgodara912 kgodara912 commented Mar 21, 2025

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

  • The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
  • The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
  • Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
  • Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
  • Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
  • All package sources are available
  • cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
  • LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
  • All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
  • sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
  • Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
  • Ready to merge

Summary

Addresses CVE-2024-8176

Change Log
  • Upgraded expat minor version to address previous CVEs
  • Added Patch for CVE-2024-8176
Does this affect the toolchain?

YES

Associated issues
  • #xxxx
Links to CVEs
Test Methodology

Signed-off-by: Kshitiz Godara <[email protected]>
@kgodara912 kgodara912 marked this pull request as ready for review March 21, 2025 02:37
@kgodara912 kgodara912 requested a review from a team as a code owner March 21, 2025 02:37
Copy link
Contributor

@Kanishk-Bansal Kanishk-Bansal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

code changes LGTM

@Kanishk-Bansal
Copy link
Contributor

/azurepipelines run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@nicogbg
Copy link
Contributor

nicogbg commented Mar 27, 2025

@nicogbg nicogbg self-requested a review March 27, 2025 12:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants