Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Correct node membership condition #6849

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 24, 2025
Merged

Conversation

achamayou
Copy link
Member

Closes #6814

@achamayou achamayou requested a review from a team as a code owner February 21, 2025 11:38
@achamayou achamayou added auto-backport Automatically backport this PR to LTS branch 5.x-todo PRs which should be backported to 5.x labels Feb 21, 2025
@eddyashton eddyashton enabled auto-merge February 24, 2025 11:09
@eddyashton eddyashton added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 24, 2025
Merged via the queue into microsoft:main with commit 868ba0a Feb 24, 2025
19 checks passed
@eddyashton eddyashton deleted the fix_read_ledger branch February 24, 2025 12:05
achamayou added a commit to achamayou/CCF that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2025
Co-authored-by: Eddy Ashton <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Eddy Ashton <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 868ba0a)

# Conflicts:
#	CHANGELOG.md
#	python/pyproject.toml
@achamayou achamayou added the backported This PR was successfully backported to LTS branch label Feb 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
5.x-todo PRs which should be backported to 5.x auto-backport Automatically backport this PR to LTS branch backported This PR was successfully backported to LTS branch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

read_ledger script does not correctly handle primary retirement
2 participants