Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding notion of a recovery owner for network recovery #6705
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Adding notion of a recovery owner for network recovery #6705
Changes from 36 commits
07b152f
7cd6011
580670c
4df08bd
491aed2
41e16fd
90cbdfb
1c1bda9
2f7ff7f
7d0fe02
607b8a4
986138a
0ae745c
33b736b
96838b7
7104982
7639bf9
8bd2d95
e5021f1
0dcc258
e0bc7a7
b28b452
8dc3f06
01df49a
7546e41
754adc3
123387b
1228c1d
12d965d
32aa899
8c931b4
ff6ba59
476636f
a2f79a9
cab53eb
d5ffb66
5f56142
02e7df9
8416064
f78144c
ae6f19a
4691ac8
9b18e9f
2b90ece
b5c3c6a
d9f1308
9f48285
969aaae
fd8ee6a
5a5d5fa
b9e2292
c01904b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's also a
checkEnum()
that will be slightly more precise (and prevent a much-later error, if C++ code tries to deserialise an unknown/badly-cased string). It doesn't have the?
optional syntax, so I think it would be something like:(I'm not completely sure of the semantics here - should
recovery_role
benull
or"NonParticipant"
?)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can't add as suggestion because it affects the untouched lines above, but suggest that this is a replacement for the "x/n" message above when
full_key_submitted
.Something like:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we want to change this then I'd suggest we tweak it to: "Full recovery key successfully submitted" as we say 'full recovery key' in cchost_config.json also.