Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Added PR title checker GitHub Actions workflow #189

Merged

Conversation

Prasanjeet-Microsoft
Copy link
Contributor

Purpose

  • The goal of this workflow is to ensure consistency in how pull requests are titled in a repository. It can check that the PR titles follow a standard naming convention or contain specific keywords (e.g., fix, feat, chore, etc.).
  • This helps maintain a clean and organized repository where it's easy to identify the purpose of a pull request just by looking at its title.

Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Deployment Validation

  • I have validated the deployment process successfully and all services are running as expected with this change.

What to Check

Verify that the following are valid

  1. Prefix: Ensure the title starts with a valid semantic type (e.g., feat:, fix:, docs:, chore:).
  2. Description: Follow the prefix with a clear and concise description of the change.
  3. Consistency: Check that the format is consistent across PRs (e.g., always using the same semantic types and structure).

@Copilot Copilot bot review requested due to automatic review settings December 19, 2024 08:10

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 1 out of 1 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

@Prasanjeet-Microsoft Prasanjeet-Microsoft merged commit ba9859d into microsoft:main Dec 20, 2024
4 checks passed
@Prasanjeet-Microsoft Prasanjeet-Microsoft deleted the Add_pr-title-checker branch December 20, 2024 06:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants