Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ISSUE-823] Query plan optimization in WHERE IN clause #830

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Jyoungho
Copy link

@Jyoungho Jyoungho commented Feb 5, 2025

Motivation

  • Query plan optimization in WHERE IN clause

Modifications

  • JpqlInSerializer parameters as an array

Result

SELECT Issue.id FROM Issue AS Issue WHERE Issue.id IN (:params)

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.54%. Comparing base (5f0dfba) to head (f1c2c63).
Report is 86 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #830      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    90.55%   90.54%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          337      337              
  Lines         3567     3566       -1     
  Branches       222      222              
===========================================
- Hits          3230     3229       -1     
  Misses         269      269              
  Partials        68       68              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants