Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RequestReply DataPlane changes #8446

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vichekaoeun
Copy link

Made some changes for the dataplane to include attribute check and timeout check

Fixes #

Proposed Changes

Pre-review Checklist

  • At least 80% unit test coverage
  • E2E tests for any new behavior
  • Docs PR for any user-facing impact
  • Spec PR for any new API feature
  • Conformance test for any change to the spec

Release Note


Docs

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 9, 2025
@knative-prow knative-prow bot requested a review from aliok February 9, 2025 01:52
Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Feb 9, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vichekaoeun
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign skonto for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link

CLA Not Signed

@knative-prow knative-prow bot requested a review from lionelvillard February 9, 2025 01:52
Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Feb 9, 2025

Welcome @vichekaoeun! It looks like this is your first PR to knative/eventing 🎉

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Feb 9, 2025
Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Feb 9, 2025

Hi @vichekaoeun. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a knative member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@Cali0707 Cali0707 changed the title UTOSS DataPlane changes DataPlane changes Feb 11, 2025
@Cali0707 Cali0707 changed the title DataPlane changes RequestReply DataPlane changes Feb 11, 2025
@Cali0707 Cali0707 self-requested a review February 11, 2025 14:11
Copy link
Member

@Cali0707 Cali0707 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice start @vichekaoeun ! Let me know if you have any questions while you work on this

@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
package main
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This file should be moved to cmd/requestreply/dataplane/main.go

fmt.Printf("handling new event: %s\n", event.String())

originalID := event.ID() //generate signed id using event id
signedID := originalID + "_signed" //placeholder for signing
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here we should do the actual signing. We likely want to make a helper function like https://github.com/d3akhtar/eventing/blob/fefc79aa7d37180e6f67b6dde8ac0982e9f3ce5e/pkg/eventfilter/subscriptionsapi/cesql_correlationid_filter.go#L214-L227, except instead of decrypting the signed data, we want to encrypt it.


responseWriter.WriteHeader(http.StatusAccepted)

id := event.Extensions()["replyAttribute"] //check if event has replyAttribute
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The name of the cloud event extension which we access should be an environment variable, for example CE_REPLY_ATTRIBUTE_NAME

responseWriter: responseWriter,
replyEvent: make(chan *cloudevents.Event, 1),
}
m.entries[id] = pr
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of id, we should be using the id + signed id attribute from the relevant cloudevent extension attribute (accessed using the env var).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants