Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove gloo prefix for deployed objs #10629

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 14, 2025
Merged

remove gloo prefix for deployed objs #10629

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 14, 2025

Conversation

lgadban
Copy link
Contributor

@lgadban lgadban commented Feb 14, 2025

No description provided.

@lgadban lgadban linked an issue Feb 14, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@lgadban lgadban added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 14, 2025
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ If release name contains chart name it will be used as a full name.
{{- .Values.gateway.fullnameOverride | trunc 63 | trimSuffix "-" }}
{{- else }}
{{- $name := default .Release.Name .Values.gateway.nameOverride }}
{{- .Release.Name | printf "gloo-proxy-%s" | trunc 63 | trimSuffix "-" }}
Copy link
Contributor

@jenshu jenshu Feb 14, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thre are a couple other places we could clean up like
devel/architecture/istio-integration.md
internal/kgateway/README.md
(not sure if those readmes themselves are up to date, but they have gloo-proxy references)

also all the e2e tests but i can take care of that as part of the current e2e cleanup/refactor

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i'll clean these up in this PR and leave anything in test/ for when they are wired back up

Copy link
Contributor

@jenshu jenshu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe we should consider allowing a name override eventually

@lgadban lgadban removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Feb 14, 2025
@jenshu jenshu added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 14, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit eac9a06 Feb 14, 2025
9 checks passed
@jenshu jenshu deleted the law/remove-prefix branch February 14, 2025 18:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

rename/drop the prefix for dynamically created resources by deployer
3 participants