Rewrite the public instances list

[TheFrenchGhosty]

Rendered version: https://github.com/TheFrenchGhosty/documentation/blob/instances-list-rewrite/Public-Instances.md

This PR is a rewrite of the public instances list from scratch.

• Instances list is now in a table, making things a LOT easier to read
• The plain text version of the table is readable (disable word wrap)
• A lot of information have been added to ease the management (mainly internally) but also so that users are aware of who runs X instance
• Prerequisites have been rewritten better, and new one have been added

---

It is "incomplete" in the sense that it's missing the link to some privacy policies, and the owners of the Tor onion, but it's enough for https://github.com/iv-org/instances-api to be adapted to work with it.

It mustn't be merged before https://github.com/iv-org/instances-api is ready to support it. (@syeopite seems to plan to rewrite its parser)

---

Took me around to do ~2 hours, it was a lot more time consuming that I expected.

---

Note:

The wording of some categories have to be discussed (mainly "DDos Protection / MITM").

[syeopite]

https://invidious.048596.xyz is ran by @tenpura-shrimp See #6

[TheFrenchGhosty]

@syeopite You're right, I got confused by this commit: a6fdd0e / #39

[FireMasterK]

Should something like "Instances using a modified source code, are required to publish their source code before they can be added to the list, and must timely publish any later modification in a timely manner." be added to prevent another #72 from happening?

[TheFrenchGhosty]

@FireMasterK

Should something like "Instances using a modified source code, are required to publish their source code before they can be added to the list, and must timely publish any later modification in a timely manner." be added to prevent another #72 from happening?

Done, thanks :)

[syeopite]

I think we should add an uptime requirement. Any instance that is down most of the time should not be added to the official list imo.

[TheFrenchGhosty]

@syeopite

I think we should add an uptime requirement. Any instance that is down most of the time should not be added to the official list imo.

This is a good idea, should how much should we require? 75%?

[unixfox]

@syeopite

I think we should add an uptime requirement. Any instance that is down most of the time should not be added to the official list imo.

This is a good idea, should how much should we require? 75%?

At the very least 90% because it's still like almost 3 days per month of downtime:

Source: https://uptime.is/

[TheFrenchGhosty]

@unixfox

@syeopite

I think we should add an uptime requirement. Any instance that is down most of the time should not be added to the official list imo.

This is a good idea, should how much should we require? 75%?

At the very least 90% because it's still like almost 3 days per months of downtime:

Source: https://uptime.is/

Yeah, you're right. 90% is the way to go I guess.

[syeopite]

This PR can get merged soon. I've finished the parser rewrite for the instances-api a few days ago. See iv-org/instances-api#30

[syeopite]

Owner for https://notyoutube.org is wrong. The actual owner is dejalavidavolar. See #58. But due to #82 it should be removed