Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enhance Documentation for Dispatch Function Compatibility #182

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kilavvy
Copy link

@kilavvy kilavvy commented Feb 26, 2025

Description:

This pull request improves the documentation for the check_dispatch_type_compatibility function. It adds a clear description of the function's purpose, specifically detailing how it checks if the dispatch target function meets the type requirements of the dispatch entry point.

Changes include:

  • Updated comments in the function_info.md and function_info.move files to provide better clarity on the functionality and usage of the dispatch mechanism.
  • Ensured consistency in documentation across relevant files.

These enhancements aim to facilitate better understanding and usage of the dispatch functionality for future developers.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Corrected typographical errors in descriptive content to enhance clarity.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Updated a public function’s name to fix a spelling mistake and improve consistency.

@kilavvy kilavvy requested a review from a team as a code owner February 26, 2025 22:56
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 26, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates documentation and renames a test function to correct typographical errors. The word "disptach" is corrected to "dispatch" in documentation files and in-code comments for the function check_dispatch_type_compatibility across two modules. Additionally, a test function in the staking module is renamed from test_staking_merge_delegation_validator_mistmatch to test_staking_merge_delegation_validator_mismatch. No changes affect the execution or logic of the code.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
precompile/.../initia_stdlib/doc/function_info.md
precompile/.../minitia_stdlib/doc/function_info.md
Corrected typographical error "disptach" to "dispatch" in documentation for check_dispatch_type_compatibility.
precompile/.../initia_stdlib/sources/function_info.move
precompile/.../minitia_stdlib/sources/function_info.move
Corrected "disptach" to "dispatch" in comments for check_dispatch_type_compatibility.
precompile/.../initia_stdlib/sources/staking.move Renamed test_staking_merge_delegation_validator_mistmatch to test_staking_merge_delegation_validator_mismatch to fix a typo.

Suggested reviewers

  • beer-1
  • ALPAC-4

Poem

I'm a bunny on a coding spree,
Hopping over typos with glee,
Dispatch is clear, the name is right,
Bugs and errors out of sight,
With a twitch of my whiskers, I celebrate the might!
🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 61b166e and f30c601.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/doc/function_info.md (1 hunks)
  • precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/function_info.move (1 hunks)
  • precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/staking.move (1 hunks)
  • precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/doc/function_info.md (1 hunks)
  • precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/function_info.move (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (5)
  • precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/function_info.move
  • precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/function_info.move
  • precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/doc/function_info.md
  • precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/doc/function_info.md
  • precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/staking.move

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant