-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 53
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feature(history-microservice): extract microservice #1019
Conversation
WalkthroughThe collective has assimilated changes to the Changes
CodeRabbit processes completion. Await further instructions. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Out of diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/full.md (2)
Line range hint
5-5
: Consider revising the phrase "all actions are passing" to a more formal tone.- [ ] all actions are passing + [ ] all checks have passed
Line range hint
47-53
: Remove the 'History-Website' section as it is no longer relevant after the extraction of the history microservice.- ## History-Website - - [ ] mobile view is usable - - [ ] desktop view is usable - - [ ] all new texts are added to the translation files (at least the english one) - - [ ] tests have been added (if required) - - [ ] shared code has been extracted in a different file
Review Details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
history-microservice/package-lock.json
is excluded by!**/package-lock.json
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/full.md (1 hunks)
Additional Context Used
LanguageTool (1)
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE/full.md (1)
Near line 5: Consider using a different verb for a more formal wording.
Context: ... [ ] all actions are passing - [ ] only fixes a single issue ## Overview <!-- Provi...
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
The Pull Request is ready
Overview