Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add ERC: A Schnorr Signature Scheme for EVM Applications #713

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pmerkleplant
Copy link

An ERC for Schnorr signatures optimized for EVM applications and compatible with known multisignature and threshold signature schemes such as musig2 and FROST.

@eip-review-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eip-review-bot commented Nov 9, 2024

File ERCS/erc-7816.md

Requires 1 more reviewers from @axic, @g11tech, @SamWilsn, @xinbenlv

ERCS/erc-XXXX.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-XXXX.md Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,206 @@
---
eip: XXXX
title: A Schnorr Signature Scheme for EVM Applications
Copy link
Contributor

@abcoathup abcoathup Nov 9, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
title: A Schnorr Signature Scheme for EVM Applications
title: Schnorr signature scheme for EVM Applications

Wanted to suggest a snappier title. EVM feels superfluous in an ERC.
"Schnorr signatures optimized for apps"

ERCS/erc-XXXX.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-XXXX.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-XXXX.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-XXXX.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ERCS/erc-XXXX.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the w-ci label Nov 10, 2024
Copy link

The commit 90e7125 (as a parent of 8af10a6) contains errors.
Please inspect the Run Summary for details.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-ci label Nov 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants