Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update README.md #343

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 23, 2025
Merged

Update README.md #343

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 23, 2025

Conversation

ElectricTea
Copy link
Contributor

@ElectricTea ElectricTea commented Feb 19, 2025

Remove mention of GNOME Calendar not supporting adding WebDAV calendars directly.

etesync-dav calendars can be added directly in GNOME Calendar version 47.

I did not test if address books can be added directly in GNOME Contacts.

Remove mention of GNOME Calendar not supporting adding WebDAV calendars directly.

etesync-dav calendars can be added directly in GNOME Calendar version 47.
@tasn
Copy link
Member

tasn commented Feb 19, 2025

Thanks! I'm not sure the changes are correct though? Evolution does work, and the hack for Gnome tools is to add to Evolution. Maybe this title/sentence need to change further?

Further change the Evolution / GNOME Contacts / GNOME Calendar section sentence structure
@ElectricTea
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi!

Evolution does work, but it is no longer required to add remote calendars in GNOME Calendar. Calendars can be added in Evolution or directly in GNOME Calendar without Evolution installed. I interpreted the original sentence as implying that remote calendars could not be added directly in GNOME Calendar and instead required Evolution.

Happy to further change the sentence structure if needed.

@tasn tasn merged commit 472b371 into etesync:master Feb 23, 2025
17 checks passed
@tasn
Copy link
Member

tasn commented Feb 23, 2025

Merged, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants