Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added Template N8N with Database #823

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

moskoweb
Copy link

@moskoweb moskoweb commented Mar 6, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Mar 6, 2025

Deploy Preview for easypanel-templates ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit a11e30a
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/easypanel-templates/deploys/67c8efcf94bce90008378417
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-823--easypanel-templates.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@moskoweb moskoweb changed the title Add N8N DB Added Template N8N with Database Mar 6, 2025
@Ahson-Shaikh
Copy link
Collaborator

@moskoweb Can we not merge it with the existing n8n, with options to deploy it with database and redis?

@moskoweb
Copy link
Author

moskoweb commented Mar 6, 2025

@moskoweb Can we not merge it with the existing n8n, with options to deploy it with database and redis?

I thought about merging, but there are those who like to use and upload the simpler n8n, for small projects, which would not need redis and postgres, so I did not merge, and brought it as a new template.

@Ahson-Shaikh
Copy link
Collaborator

@moskoweb No. You can provide a checkbox with people needing DB and Redis to enable it and render the services based on the conditional logic of those checkboxes being ticked (true/false)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants