UintPtr & IntPtr struct – rewording

[deep-outcome]

Summary

Microfix of bad wording.

[opbld32]

Docs Build status updates of commit b655649:

✅ Validation status: passed

File	Status	Preview URL	Details
xml/System/IntPtr.xml	✅Succeeded	View
xml/System/UIntPtr.xml	✅Succeeded	View

For more details, please refer to the build report.

Note: Broken links written as relative paths are included in the above build report. For broken links written as absolute paths or external URLs, see the broken link report.

For any questions, please:

• Try searching the docs.microsoft.com contributor guides
• Post your question in the Docs support channel

[MSDN-WhiteKnight]

Why is this change needed? Is the current wording incorrect grammar, unclear, or considered bad writing style?

[deep-outcome]

Why is this change needed? Is the current wording incorrect grammar, unclear, or considered bad writing style?

It has bad formula. Data are not referenced by language. At least for me, it seems confusing. The more that UintPtr/IntPtr will likely be used only in one of them. So between as conjunction of meaning in the middle is slightly inaccurate.

Sense is clear in common language but in technical vocabulary I mean not.

[MSDN-WhiteKnight]

This PR likely conflicted with #8132