Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Online Community Working Group #23
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Online Community Working Group #23
Changes from 12 commits
8f1d8d4
01fed14
b707b3a
ac45ba1
9941014
a7a514b
a5a6b8c
22dce75
d11cbf7
4bfcfbb
d69fa6b
f569195
2677d2d
fc77ff0
28b91e3
3c0f474
237ae52
efeac4e
25acbef
da4cf6c
5d75876
68e0bc4
d24a869
36286f2
9ec83bd
6237e51
d60d082
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think really important to fill this seat before we vote. I would also really like if this is someone that moderates or administers the forum. So far I only see @nessita as an option here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can confirm it’s mandatory for all groups to have a co-chair.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@nessita would you like to be Co-Chair?
I would like to have another person from the Forum at least as a member. I will ping those that haven't commented here one last time, otherwise the other option as I see it would be to promote someone into that role on the Forum who is engaged in this WG.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note for other groups we’ve had feedback it wasn’t clear how to self-nominate. The social media WG charter has this language instead:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we not stick with Discord in the WG definitions? We could be less specific saying:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How the mention of Discord any different from the mention of Slack or Google Groups in other WG definitions?
I'm happy to be corrected, but I see this repo as 'living' so if we do change how we do calls as a WG then this document can be updated to reflect that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
At the moment the WGs (all? mostly?) have a space on Slack. I don't see this as strictly necessary as long as all WG members are happy to use the stated platform.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
See our documentation on Changes to Working Groups and what qualifies as a "substantive" change that requires board approval, and what can be done without that. If in doubt just check with us :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the difference between these two? Is there going to be a report about "problematic" users to be shared privately with the Board and/or the CoC?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This addresses Thibaud's comment here where he mentions the requirement for a private report if sensitive topics are discussed. I could see "problematic" users being one of those sensitive topics.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is similar to how the Code of Conduct WG reports as well. A public transparency report that has additional context privately provided to the board when appropriate.