-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 316
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Many changes to the build system #1351
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
What do you even need a CLA for on a MIT licensed repo? |
fe2fb75
to
b5256ab
Compare
Thanks for the PR. Could you explain the reason for it? Changing the whole build and CI system is a very invasive change and it would be a lot better to open an issue and discuss it first. The current setup is a result of 4 years of maintenance of this crate and closely follows how V8 is built in Chromium project. I'm wary that we can change it all in one go. |
I started working on this when I tried to get rusty_v8 to build for android. The reason is that the current setup is actually not that close to chromium's build process, which uses This literally does exactly what using depot_tools would be doing, except without all the bloat and only one dependency of python 3.6+. The There are some issues currently, like the libicu msvc one, but the clang build succeeds. I will try this with the official v8 build procedure later and figure out whats the difference and if there is any in the first place. |
@33KK This is a big change and we would need to consider it carefully - that said, the build system could definitely be improved. We have been attempting to avoid gclient and instead include all source code in the crate itself, so that no external dependencies needed to be downloaded during the build. I'm not sure how useful that design has been for us. I've often thought that we should refactor rusty_v8 to just depend on gclient and depot_tools and download during the build. It seems you're trying something in between our very manual setup and just depending on gclient. Why not just use gclient? I would very much like to avoid maintaining scripts to parse DEPS. |
The reason is that the core parts of cipd and gclient aren't very complex, depot_tools on the other hand depends on a lot of native binaries and downloads it's own python interpreter, including python2 for some reason; these scripts only really need git and python 3.6+, so they should be much more portable and lightweight. There really isn't much "parsing" involved, the DEPS file is just valid python, so it's just eval'd. The scripts are very simple really, I never even wrote any python before. The scripts probably could be refactored to be a bit cleaner still. |
Thanks for the detailed explanation @33KK. While I can appreciate the lightweight nature of your proposed solution, it does bring in additional points of potential failure and maintenance. Even if the setup is trivial now, we would still be, for example, tethered to the format of the DEPS file. Any changes to this would require us to be vigilant and reactive. Currently, our manual setup has its quirks, but it's consistent, known, and doesn't introduce dependencies on additional scripts. Our decision to include all source code in the crate, though tedious, was deliberate to avoid external build-time dependencies. I am not against moving to a more automated approach. But, in my opinion, if we decide to step away from our manual system, we might as well lean into the established infrastructure of gclient. A halfway solution, as you've suggested, may not provide the clarity and simplicity we're aiming for in the long run. I'm genuinely open to reevaluating our approach, but I believe it's crucial to ensure our chosen path is sustainable, clear, and beneficial in the bigger picture. |
I've been testing your scripts and was able to build V8 on Linux with them. There were some minor issues, for which I have a diff with some fixes below. As part of figuring out what was going wrong, I went through the scripts in detail and can confirm they are indeed pretty simple, really a breath of fresh air compared to all the bloat of depot_tools and gclient, great stuff. diff --git a/scripts/build_v8.py b/scripts/build_v8.py
old mode 100644
new mode 100755
index 11ccfd3..48dec93
--- a/scripts/build_v8.py
+++ b/scripts/build_v8.py
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python
+
import os
import sys
import shutil
@@ -107,7 +109,9 @@ def build_v8(
gn_args["target_cpu"] = q(target_cpu)
gn_args["v8_target_cpu"] = q(target_cpu)
- gn_args["cc_wrapper"] = q(find_cc_wrapper())
+ cc_wrapper = find_cc_wrapper()
+ if cc_wrapper:
+ gn_args["cc_wrapper"] = q(cc_wrapper)
if not use_custom_libcxx:
gn_args["use_custom_libcxx"] = False |
The lastchange hook fails to run on the denoland/chromium_build, works fine either without --depth=1, but takes forever to clone, or also works on latest upstream chromium/src/build @tritao oops, missed that, thanks |
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/chromium-dev/c/weYzs3_WWts?pli=1 that's kinda interesting, but doesn't really change much, it still basically requires gclient for the CIPD dependencies, conditions (via gclient-condition in .gitmodules) and hooks; and besides that, it's not even a thing in the v8 repo, at least yet. The thing I don't like about depot_tools is the complexity and dependence on some third party packages, which basically requires either vpython which downloads 800 MB of stuff or manually setting it up, which may or may not work. On top of gclient would just download everything in the DEPS including the pretty large repos like test262, etc which aren't necessary for the build. Fixing this would require patching the DEPS file, which is an option I guess, but I wouldn't call it a good one. Another option is just converting DEPS to .gitmodules but that also doesn't really work because of the CIPD dependencies and conditions. Conditions could be hardcoded into the build script though I guess |
Still TODO is the CI, prebuilts and some other things
Also doesn't use the libicu patch, not sure what it even is forright, crate size concerns, shouldn't be an issue anymoreclangd may or may not workninja -C target/release/build/v8-****/out/out -t compdb > compile_commands.json
Not tested yet: macos (can't get a vm working), android with external ndk clang, building with deno
Not working yet: windoze with msvc (fails on libicu, EDIT: this actually also fails with upstream rusty_v8)