Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[v5.4] [skip-ci] RPM: Add riscv64 to ExclusiveArch-es #25613

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

This is an automated cherry-pick of #25600

/assign lsm5


Signed-off-by: Yanko Kaneti <[email protected]>
Copy link
Member

@lsm5 lsm5 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 18, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 18, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: lsm5, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 18, 2025
@Luap99 Luap99 added release-note-none and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Enforce release-note requirement, even if just None labels Mar 18, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 227df90 into containers:v5.4 Mar 18, 2025
41 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants