Upgrade Windows builder to windows-2025
#10290
Open
+3
−3
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This is an attempt to address bytecodealliance#10289 and unblock the upgrade of Wasmtime in the wasmtime-go bindings. Honestly I'm lost in the number of MinGW bugs we're dodging at this point. Regardless though this is something that will need to be done at some point anyway and theoretically shouldn't cause any other regressions, so I figured I might as well go ahead and do this and hopefully fix some MinGW issues while I'm at it.
cfallin
approved these changes
Feb 25, 2025
github-merge-queue
bot
removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is an attempt to address #10289 and unblock the upgrade of Wasmtime in the wasmtime-go bindings. Honestly I'm lost in the number of MinGW bugs we're dodging at this point. Regardless though this is something that will need to be done at some point anyway and theoretically shouldn't cause any other regressions, so I figured I might as well go ahead and do this and hopefully fix some MinGW issues while I'm at it.