Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor how generated model setters/getters are generated #3323

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SergeyRyabinin
Copy link
Contributor

@SergeyRyabinin SergeyRyabinin commented Mar 3, 2025

Issue #, if available:
duplicated items in headers and documentation

  • remove duplication for class enums types (remove const ref& as it has no effect or performance benefits)
  • remove duplication for all other types by using perfect forwarding approach.

Both changes are backward compatible (before: functions were explicitly declared as inline headers-only, after: functions are declared as perfect forwarding template functions).

Description of changes:
this change reduces generated documentation size from
333,061 items, totalling 13.0 GB
to
332,822 items, totalling 10.1 GB

The generated documentation would also look prettier:
image
vs existing
image

Check all that applies:

  • Did a review by yourself.
  • Added proper tests to cover this PR. (If tests are not applicable, explain.)
  • Checked if this PR is a breaking (APIs have been changed) change.
  • Checked if this PR will not introduce cross-platform inconsistent behavior.
  • Checked if this PR would require a ReadMe/Wiki update.

Check which platforms you have built SDK on to verify the correctness of this PR.

  • Linux
  • Windows
  • Android
  • MacOS
  • IOS
  • Other Platforms

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@SergeyRyabinin SergeyRyabinin changed the title Sr/model shrinkage Refactor how generated model setters/getters are generated Mar 3, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@sbiscigl sbiscigl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

approved, maybe try to clean up some of the commented out code

{
}

###set($useRequiredField = true)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit removed if commented out

@SergeyRyabinin SergeyRyabinin marked this pull request as ready for review March 11, 2025 21:19
@SergeyRyabinin SergeyRyabinin requested a review from sbera87 March 11, 2025 21:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants