Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add UTs to Processor Execute() #1890

Merged
merged 48 commits into from
Feb 28, 2025
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
48 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
fe432e2
init
RodrigoVillar Jan 23, 2025
81b93f8
nit
RodrigoVillar Jan 23, 2025
12f310d
Merge branch 'main' into add-processor-uts
RodrigoVillar Jan 24, 2025
3e9f766
use avalanchego logger
RodrigoVillar Jan 24, 2025
467d7b8
create processor instead of chain
RodrigoVillar Jan 24, 2025
5cdc674
use constructors and lambda funcs
RodrigoVillar Jan 24, 2025
d3920c0
use constructor for tx
RodrigoVillar Jan 26, 2025
dd9c5a9
nit
RodrigoVillar Jan 27, 2025
d2da050
consistent block timestamps
RodrigoVillar Jan 27, 2025
8791a01
Merge branch 'main' into add-processor-uts
RodrigoVillar Jan 28, 2025
37dc75c
add delimiter
RodrigoVillar Jan 28, 2025
3fa517d
consistent naming
RodrigoVillar Jan 28, 2025
3598dc7
group dependencies/parameters
RodrigoVillar Jan 28, 2025
33e0fe4
each test defines worker
RodrigoVillar Jan 28, 2025
2bbc489
each test defines validitywindow
RodrigoVillar Jan 28, 2025
390c816
createBlock returns only block
RodrigoVillar Jan 28, 2025
7aa3fd1
consistent usage of require
RodrigoVillar Jan 28, 2025
9cd1db1
each test declares rules
RodrigoVillar Jan 28, 2025
3395a71
remove unnecessary commit to db
RodrigoVillar Jan 28, 2025
c5750f8
replace map with merkledb
RodrigoVillar Jan 28, 2025
167755c
export chain metrics
RodrigoVillar Jan 28, 2025
d56316e
nits
RodrigoVillar Jan 28, 2025
8b4f12e
nits
RodrigoVillar Jan 28, 2025
a51526d
rename block constructor
RodrigoVillar Jan 28, 2025
6acef69
use single time
RodrigoVillar Jan 28, 2025
d9e0a43
nit
RodrigoVillar Jan 28, 2025
c0934f6
use constant time when possible
RodrigoVillar Jan 29, 2025
de7142d
nit
RodrigoVillar Jan 29, 2025
7f3e6ea
nit
RodrigoVillar Jan 29, 2025
6afe172
remove lambda funcs
RodrigoVillar Jan 29, 2025
d23cd97
Merge branch 'main' into add-processor-uts
RodrigoVillar Jan 29, 2025
0ef1f29
use single genesis rules
RodrigoVillar Jan 30, 2025
fc22e50
replace db with view
RodrigoVillar Jan 30, 2025
4b12eee
add view helper function
RodrigoVillar Jan 30, 2025
c4aeff6
nit
RodrigoVillar Jan 30, 2025
f5036f5
nit
RodrigoVillar Jan 30, 2025
0040c01
remove unnecessary workers
RodrigoVillar Jan 30, 2025
9b6b114
Merge branch 'main' into add-processor-uts
RodrigoVillar Jan 30, 2025
41c7fb2
Merge branch 'main' into add-processor-uts
RodrigoVillar Feb 7, 2025
5844161
add block ctx
RodrigoVillar Feb 7, 2025
dae8bde
tests fail for exact reason
RodrigoVillar Feb 7, 2025
4ca4ebf
create tx separate from block
RodrigoVillar Feb 7, 2025
9f50828
use subtest assertions
RodrigoVillar Feb 7, 2025
a483f4a
Merge branch 'main' into add-processor-uts
RodrigoVillar Feb 11, 2025
2d3bf36
Update chain/processor_test.go
RodrigoVillar Feb 28, 2025
73453cc
Update chain/processor_test.go
RodrigoVillar Feb 28, 2025
f39c8f8
Merge branch 'main' into add-processor-uts
RodrigoVillar Feb 28, 2025
a5ba263
nit
RodrigoVillar Feb 28, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
Next Next commit
rename block constructor
RodrigoVillar committed Jan 28, 2025

Verified

This commit was created on GitHub.com and signed with GitHub’s verified signature.
commit a51526d694980f62ac6132a6a0e7a71229a0e3c4
34 changes: 17 additions & 17 deletions chain/processor_test.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ func TestProcessorExecute(t *testing.T) {
workers workers.Workers
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: move this to be adjacent to validityWindow so that dependencies and parameters are grouped to be adjacent with each other

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we need workers.Workers here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed workers from tests

isNormalOp bool
db merkledb.MerkleDB
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we use merkledb.View instead of merkledb.MerkleDB ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

createBlock func(ids.ID) *chain.StatelessBlock
newBlockF func(ids.ID) *chain.StatelessBlock
expectedErr error
}{
{
@@ -85,13 +85,13 @@ func TestProcessorExecute(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, db.Put([]byte(feeKey), []byte{}))
return db
}(),
createBlock: createValidBlock,
newBlockF: createValidBlock,
},
{
name: "block timestamp too late",
validityWindow: &validitywindowtest.MockTimeValidityWindow[*chain.Transaction]{},
workers: workers.NewSerial(),
createBlock: func(root ids.ID) *chain.StatelessBlock {
newBlockF: func(root ids.ID) *chain.StatelessBlock {
block, err := chain.NewStatelessBlock(
ids.Empty,
time.Now().Add(chain.FutureBound).UnixMilli()+int64(time.Second),
@@ -114,15 +114,15 @@ func TestProcessorExecute(t *testing.T) {
return w
}(),
db: createDB(),
createBlock: createValidBlock,
newBlockF: createValidBlock,
expectedErr: workers.ErrShutdown,
},
{
name: "failed to get parent height",
validityWindow: &validitywindowtest.MockTimeValidityWindow[*chain.Transaction]{},
workers: workers.NewSerial(),
db: createDB(),
createBlock: createValidBlock,
newBlockF: createValidBlock,
expectedErr: chain.ErrFailedToFetchParentHeight,
},
{
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ func TestProcessorExecute(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, db.Put([]byte(heightKey), []byte{}))
return db
}(),
createBlock: createValidBlock,
newBlockF: createValidBlock,
expectedErr: chain.ErrFailedToParseParentHeight,
},
{
@@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ func TestProcessorExecute(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, db.Put([]byte(heightKey), binary.BigEndian.AppendUint64(nil, 0)))
return db
}(),
createBlock: func(parentRoot ids.ID) *chain.StatelessBlock {
newBlockF: func(parentRoot ids.ID) *chain.StatelessBlock {
block, err := chain.NewStatelessBlock(
ids.Empty,
time.Now().UnixMilli(),
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ func TestProcessorExecute(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, db.Put([]byte(heightKey), binary.BigEndian.AppendUint64(nil, 0)))
return db
}(),
createBlock: createValidBlock,
newBlockF: createValidBlock,
expectedErr: chain.ErrFailedToFetchParentTimestamp,
},
{
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ func TestProcessorExecute(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, db.Put([]byte(timestampKey), []byte{}))
return db
}(),
createBlock: createValidBlock,
newBlockF: createValidBlock,
expectedErr: chain.ErrFailedToParseParentTimestamp,
},
{
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ func TestProcessorExecute(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, db.Put([]byte(timestampKey), binary.BigEndian.AppendUint64(nil, 0)))
return db
}(),
createBlock: func(parentRoot ids.ID) *chain.StatelessBlock {
newBlockF: func(parentRoot ids.ID) *chain.StatelessBlock {
block, err := chain.NewStatelessBlock(
ids.Empty,
0,
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ func TestProcessorExecute(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, db.Put([]byte(timestampKey), binary.BigEndian.AppendUint64(nil, 0)))
return db
}(),
createBlock: func(parentRoot ids.ID) *chain.StatelessBlock {
newBlockF: func(parentRoot ids.ID) *chain.StatelessBlock {
block, err := chain.NewStatelessBlock(
ids.Empty,
0,
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ func TestProcessorExecute(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, db.Put([]byte(timestampKey), binary.BigEndian.AppendUint64(nil, 0)))
return db
}(),
createBlock: createValidBlock,
newBlockF: createValidBlock,
expectedErr: chain.ErrFailedToFetchParentFee,
},
{
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ func TestProcessorExecute(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, db.Put([]byte(feeKey), []byte{}))
return db
}(),
createBlock: createValidBlock,
newBlockF: createValidBlock,
expectedErr: errMockVerifyExpiryReplayProtection,
},
{
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ func TestProcessorExecute(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, db.Put([]byte(feeKey), []byte{}))
return db
}(),
createBlock: func(parentRoot ids.ID) *chain.StatelessBlock {
newBlockF: func(parentRoot ids.ID) *chain.StatelessBlock {
block, err := chain.NewStatelessBlock(
ids.Empty,
time.Now().UnixMilli(),
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ func TestProcessorExecute(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, db.Put([]byte(feeKey), []byte{}))
return db
}(),
createBlock: func(ids.ID) *chain.StatelessBlock {
newBlockF: func(ids.ID) *chain.StatelessBlock {
block, err := chain.NewStatelessBlock(
ids.Empty,
time.Now().UnixMilli(),
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ func TestProcessorExecute(t *testing.T) {
require.NoError(t, db.Put([]byte(feeKey), []byte{}))
return db
}(),
createBlock: func(parentRoot ids.ID) *chain.StatelessBlock {
newBlockF: func(parentRoot ids.ID) *chain.StatelessBlock {
block, err := chain.NewStatelessBlock(
ids.Empty,
time.Now().UnixMilli(),
@@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ func TestProcessorExecute(t *testing.T) {
_, err = processor.Execute(
ctx,
tt.db,
chain.NewExecutionBlock(tt.createBlock(root)),
chain.NewExecutionBlock(tt.newBlockF(root)),
tt.isNormalOp,
)
r.ErrorIs(err, tt.expectedErr)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(separate PR) - could we confirm the post state is what we expect as well ie. we should make sure that the metadata is updated correctly and that tx/action execution (include successful and failed w/ rollbacks) has the expected effect

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ack