Fix stale host / port bug for failure detector

[yashmayya]

• The query service port for a server (used for MSE queries) can change across server restarts.
• There is currently an edge case scenario with the failure detector mechanism (See Rewrite FailureDetector interface and implementations to also work with the multi-stage engine #15005, Add connection based FailureDetector #8491 for background) in a scenario where there are MSE queries pre server restart that have established gRPC channels to the server host / port, and there aren't any MSE queries post server restart. Here, if an SSE query failure triggers the failure detector mechanism to mark the server as unhealthy, the server won't be marked as healthy until the retry period ends or if an MSE query is sent and a new gRPC channel is established to the server's new query service port.
• This patch fixes the issue to not use stale host / port information for the failure detector's retry mechanism.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 12 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 63.45%. Comparing base (59551e4) to head (abaf5b3).
Report is 1753 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
.../pinot/query/service/dispatch/QueryDispatcher.java	0.00%	8 Missing ⚠️
...roker/requesthandler/GrpcBrokerRequestHandler.java	0.00%	3 Missing ⚠️
...requesthandler/MultiStageBrokerRequestHandler.java	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #15116      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     61.75%   63.45%   +1.70%     
- Complexity      207     1480    +1273     
============================================
  Files          2436     2748     +312     
  Lines        133233   154441   +21208     
  Branches      20636    23816    +3180     
============================================
+ Hits          82274    98000   +15726     
- Misses        44911    49045    +4134     
- Partials       6048     7396    +1348     

Flag	Coverage Δ
custom-integration1	100.00% <ø> (+99.99%)	⬆️
integration	100.00% <ø> (+99.99%)	⬆️
integration1	100.00% <ø> (+99.99%)	⬆️
integration2	0.00% <ø> (ø)
java-11	63.41% <0.00%> (+1.70%)	⬆️
java-21	63.34% <0.00%> (+1.72%)	⬆️
skip-bytebuffers-false	63.44% <0.00%> (+1.69%)	⬆️
skip-bytebuffers-true	63.31% <0.00%> (+35.58%)	⬆️
temurin	63.45% <0.00%> (+1.70%)	⬆️
unittests	63.45% <0.00%> (+1.70%)	⬆️
unittests1	56.06% <0.00%> (+9.17%)	⬆️
unittests2	33.98% <0.00%> (+6.25%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.