Reduce duplication across user guide for "parameterisation" sections #233
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi,
We were looking at making some contributions to the user guide but found it a little difficult with the many (sub-)sections being split a little differently. A few of the files here, Docs/UserGuide/parameterisation, were not included into the main .tex file. This meant that edits had to be made in two places to prevent the sources from being out of sync.
In this PR, I have taken the most recent changes from the main "userguide.tex" file and pasted them into the sub-files, to ensure nothing is lost. Then there will be one golden source for each section.
What do you think, is this okay to do? :)
Thanks a lot!
Fredrik