Add initial versions of peep animation objects

[AaronVanGeffen]

This is a supporting PR to OpenRCT2/OpenRCT2#23328. The objects proposed in this PR were dumped using a Python script.

To do:

• Order string table by language/key
• Correct image table to account for rotations
• Add inline image sprite ids
• Add legacy positions to animation groups
• Remove legacy entertainerCostumes array from scenery groups
• Entertainers: drop unused eatFood animation
• Deduplicate guest and security animations (inherit from first group?)
• Format animation sequence in one line?? -> not supported by our formatter
• Add RCT1 source games where appropriate

I'd prefer this PR to be squash merged into one commit.

[ZeeMaji]

I noticed that the RCT1 source games were missing from the objects when objects shared between both RCT1 & RCT2 define RCT2 as the primary source game with whatever RCT1 pack they originated in as a second source game. From some research i did these should be the RCT1 source games for all of the peep animation objects.

RCT1:
Guest
Handyman
Mechanic
Security Guard
Entertainer Elephant
Entertainer Panda
Entertainer Tiger

RCT1AA:
Entertainer Roman
Entertainer Gorilla

RCT1LL:
Entertainer Astronaut
Entertainer Knight
Entertainer Snowman

Anything not listed here is RCT2 only (eg: pirate costume).
These should be correct from the research i did, the RCT1 base game only has the base three costumes when i checked the RCT1 demo in a scenario with the roman theming available, the roman & gorilla entertainers are after the standard three in https://github.com/OpenRCT2/OpenRCT2/blob/develop/src/openrct2/rct1/Tables.cpp with the gorilla costume appearing in the RCT1AA DLC scenario PC Player, and the latter ones after it are all from scenery groups that originated in RCT1LL

[AaronVanGeffen]

Good idea. I'll amend my script and redump.

[ZeeMaji]

They're in the wrong order as the first entry is for the primary source game that's displayed in text on the object selection window, it should be like this:

    "sourceGame": [
        "rct2",
        "rct1ll"
    ],

[AaronVanGeffen]

@ZeeMaji Thanks, I had no idea. I've changed the order to what you suggested.

[Gymnasiast]

I haven’t extensively checked the objects, but since this already got reviewed by Maji, I think we can proceed.

One request: we generally have the en-GB string on top in the translations. Could you change that order? If not, no big deal.