Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[17.0][MIG] mrp_workorder_sequence: Migration to 17.0 #1264

Merged
merged 34 commits into from
Jun 13, 2024

Conversation

peluko00
Copy link
Contributor

@peluko00 peluko00 commented Apr 24, 2024

Module migrated to version 17.0

cc https://github.com/APSL 154409
@miquelalzanillas @lbarry-apsl @javierobcn @mpascuall please review

LoisRForgeFlow and others added 30 commits April 24, 2024 08:52
Currently translated at 100.0% (3 of 3 strings)

Translation: manufacture-15.0/manufacture-15.0-mrp_workorder_sequence
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/manufacture-15-0/manufacture-15-0-mrp_workorder_sequence/it/
Test sequence is applied for multiple operations
Rewrite _reset_work_order_sequence in a more pythonic way
Change _order of mrp.workorder to use sequence
Set sequence on existing workorders after module install
Currently translated at 100.0% (3 of 3 strings)

Translation: manufacture-15.0/manufacture-15.0-mrp_workorder_sequence
Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/manufacture-15-0/manufacture-15-0-mrp_workorder_sequence/it/
@peluko00 peluko00 mentioned this pull request Apr 24, 2024
15 tasks
Copy link
Member

@lbarry-apsl lbarry-apsl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Validated functionality in Runboat

Copy link

@mpascuall mpascuall left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Functionally working, tested in runboat

@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR has the approved label and has been created more than 5 days ago. It should therefore be ready to merge by a maintainer (or a PSC member if the concerned addon has no declared maintainer). 🤖

@peluko00
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ready for merge @LoisRForgeFlow ?

Copy link
Contributor

@LoisRForgeFlow LoisRForgeFlow left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code review LGTM

/ocabot merge nobump

@LoisRForgeFlow
Copy link
Contributor

/ocabot migration mrp_workorder_sequence

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot added this to the 17.0 milestone Jun 13, 2024
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

What a great day to merge this nice PR. Let's do it!
Prepared branch 17.0-ocabot-merge-pr-1264-by-LoisRForgeFlow-bump-nobump, awaiting test results.

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot merged commit 501b679 into OCA:17.0 Jun 13, 2024
5 checks passed
@OCA-git-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations, your PR was merged at 4d44182. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.