Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0][ADD] account_payment_order_filename: new module #1308

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 16.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

acsonefho
Copy link
Contributor

Add new module account_payment_order_filename to let the user customize the file generated. This behavior use sequence to also have the possibility to generate a unique filename if necessary

Add new module account_payment_order_filename to let the user customize the file generated. This behavior use sequence to also have the possibility to generate a unique filename if necessary
@acsonefho acsonefho force-pushed the account_payement_order_filename branch from 35ff8e7 to 0ed12ad Compare July 5, 2024 11:49

|badge1| |badge2| |badge3| |badge4| |badge5|

This module let the possibility to the user to specify a sequence for the filename generation on the payment order.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you add a CONTEXT.rst explaining when this is useful?

A question I'd ask is in which circumstance we need a different number for the files than the payment orders.

@gdgellatly
Copy link
Contributor

gdgellatly commented Sep 13, 2024

Why does this module override the specific sepa file and not generate_payment_file?

I took a look, it would be much easier, just depend on account_payment_order and adjust the super of that with the filename and then everything, not just modules depending on pain_base can use. The finalize sepa seems to just return to generate_payment_file anyway. I feel like I must be missing something.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants