Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

p2l attribute issue #1395

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 19, 2025
Merged

Conversation

mickaelaccensi
Copy link
Collaborator

@mickaelaccensi mickaelaccensi commented Mar 17, 2025

Pull Request Summary

correct the attributes on p2l output variable to apply correct units and scale_factor depending on output field type (integer or real)

Description

correct the attributes on p2l output variable to apply correct units and scale_factor depending on output field type (integer or real)
ww3_tp1.7 would be the only one affected by the changes

Issue(s) addressed

solve issue #1394 and minor issue #1393

Commit Message

correct the attributes on p2l output variable

Check list

Testing

  • How were these changes tested? matrix
  • Are the changes covered by regression tests? (If not, why? Do new tests need to be added?) ww3_tp1.7
  • Have the matrix regression tests been run (if yes, please note HPC and compiler)? datarmor, intel compiler
  • Please indicate the expected changes in the regression test output, (Note the list of known non-identical tests.) only in netcdf output field containing p2l variable
  • Please provide the summary output of matrix.comp (matrix.Diff.txt, matrixCompFull.txt and matrixCompSummary.txt): ongoing

Sorry, something went wrong.

@sbanihash
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you @mickaelaccensi for working on this fix and submitting the PR. I will be reviewing this PR soon.

@sbanihash sbanihash self-requested a review March 17, 2025 16:57
@JessicaMeixner-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

FYI @kestonsmith-noaa - This might be relevant to work you are doing.

Copy link
Collaborator

@JessicaMeixner-NOAA JessicaMeixner-NOAA left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @mickaelaccensi

*********************************************************************
********************* non-identical cases ****************************
**********************************************************************
mww3_test_03/./work_PR1_MPI_e                     (1 files differ)
mww3_test_03/./work_PR3_UQ_MPI_e_c                     (1 files differ)
mww3_test_03/./work_PR3_UNO_MPI_e                     (1 files differ)
mww3_test_03/./work_PR2_UQ_MPI_e                     (1 files differ)
mww3_test_03/./work_PR2_UNO_MPI_e                     (1 files differ)
mww3_test_03/./work_PR2_UNO_MPI_d2                     (16 files differ)
mww3_test_03/./work_PR1_MPI_d2                     (9 files differ)
mww3_test_03/./work_PR3_UNO_MPI_d2_c                     (14 files differ)
mww3_test_03/./work_PR3_UQ_MPI_d2_c                     (15 files differ)
mww3_test_03/./work_PR3_UNO_MPI_d2                     (15 files differ)
mww3_test_03/./work_PR2_UQ_MPI_d2                     (15 files differ)
mww3_test_03/./work_PR3_UQ_MPI_e                     (1 files differ)
mww3_test_03/./work_PR3_UNO_MPI_e_c                     (1 files differ)
mww3_test_03/./work_PR3_UQ_MPI_d2                     (16 files differ)
mww3_test_09/./work_MPI_ASCII                     (0 files differ)
ww3_tp1.7/./work_PR3_UQ                     (1 files differ)
ww3_tp2.10/./work_MPI_OMPH                     (7 files differ)
ww3_tp2.16/./work_MPI_OMPH                     (4 files differ)
ww3_tp2.6/./work_ST4_ASCII                     (0 files differ)
ww3_tp2.7/./work_ST0                     (0 files differ)
ww3_ufs1.3/./work_a                     (3 files differ)

All are either know b4b or the tp1.7 and ww3_tp2.7/./work_ST0 is because no more fort.10111 file.

matrixCompFull.txt
matrixCompSummary.txt
matrixDiff.txt

@JessicaMeixner-NOAA JessicaMeixner-NOAA merged commit b9ab69b into NOAA-EMC:develop Mar 19, 2025
3 of 6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants